From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 10 May 2001 20:05:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 10 May 2001 20:05:31 -0400 Received: from p3EE3CA1A.dip.t-dialin.net ([62.227.202.26]:19723 "HELO emma1.emma.line.org") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 10 May 2001 20:05:16 -0400 Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 01:37:26 +0200 From: Matthias Andree To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: reiserfs, xfs, ext2, ext3 Message-ID: <20010511013726.C31966@emma1.emma.line.org> Mail-Followup-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <01050910381407.26653@bugs> <20010510134453.A6816@emma1.emma.line.org> <3AFA9AD8.7080203@magenta-netlogic.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3AFA9AD8.7080203@magenta-netlogic.com>; from tmh@magenta-netlogic.com on Thu, May 10, 2001 at 14:42:48 +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 10 May 2001, Tony Hoyle wrote: > Hmm... Reiserfs is incompatible with knfsd? That might explain the > massive data loss I was getting with reiserfs (basically I'd have to > reformat and reinstall every couple of weeks). The machine this was > happening with also exports my apt cache for the rest of the network. You're not getting data loss, but access denied, when hitting incompatibilities, and it looks like it hits 2.2 hard while 2.4 is less of a problem. Please search the reiserfs list archives for details. vs-13048 is a good search term, I believe.