From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 10 May 2001 20:05:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 10 May 2001 20:05:30 -0400 Received: from p3EE3CA1A.dip.t-dialin.net ([62.227.202.26]:20491 "HELO emma1.emma.line.org") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 10 May 2001 20:05:18 -0400 Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 01:39:13 +0200 From: Matthias Andree To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: reiserfs, xfs, ext2, ext3 Message-ID: <20010511013913.D31966@emma1.emma.line.org> Mail-Followup-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <01050910381407.26653@bugs> <20010510134453.A6816@emma1.emma.line.org> <3AFA9AD8.7080203@magenta-netlogic.com> <3AFAA98A.F79471CF@namesys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3AFAA98A.F79471CF@namesys.com>; from reiser@namesys.com on Thu, May 10, 2001 at 07:45:31 -0700 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 10 May 2001, Hans Reiser wrote: > > Hmm... Reiserfs is incompatible with knfsd? That might explain the > > we have a patch on our website. I'm always wondering why the patch hasn't been merged. Is it so dangerous to apply in that it might distract other pieces of the system? Has anyone reported increased problems after applying the patch? -- Matthias Andree