From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 16 May 2001 05:05:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 16 May 2001 05:05:16 -0400 Received: from obelix.hrz.tu-chemnitz.de ([134.109.132.55]:31693 "EHLO obelix.hrz.tu-chemnitz.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 16 May 2001 05:04:57 -0400 Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 11:04:50 +0200 From: Ingo Oeser To: Rik van Riel Cc: Alan Cox , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants Message-ID: <20010516110450.D754@nightmaster.csn.tu-chemnitz.de> In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: ; from riel@conectiva.com.br on Mon, May 14, 2001 at 09:33:35PM -0300 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 09:33:35PM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote: > Agreed. However, if this thing means I cannot use the -linus > tree without devfs, then it will also mean my VM stuff only > gets tested on -ac kernels... No Problem. I test most of your VM stuff anyway and I use devfs on that machine ;-) PS: It's not that hard to build a machine, which can support both. E-Mail me, if you would like to know _how_ to do that. Regards Ingo Oeser -- 10.+11.03.2001 - 3. Chemnitzer LinuxTag <<<<<<<<<<<< been there and had much fun >>>>>>>>>>>>