From: Matti Aarnio <matti.aarnio@zmailer.org>
To: "Udo A. Steinberg" <reality@delusion.de>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac10
Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 21:51:33 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010517215133.J5947@mea-ext.zmailer.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E150QuA-0005ah-00@the-village.bc.nu> <3B041980.BC22BA38@delusion.de> <20010517214039.I5947@mea-ext.zmailer.org>
In-Reply-To: <20010517214039.I5947@mea-ext.zmailer.org>; from matti.aarnio@zmailer.org on Thu, May 17, 2001 at 09:40:39PM +0300
On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 09:40:39PM +0300, Matti Aarnio wrote:
> On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 08:33:36PM +0200, Udo A. Steinberg wrote:
> > With 2.4.4-ac10 and binutils 2.11 I get the following warnings:
>
> It is a warning about kernel code using assembler statements
> which are not valid with some older assemblers.
Naeh, I am confusing (you, and myself). Fixing those (adding the '*')
would not work with some older assemblers.
Claiming minimum level of 2.10/2.11 for assembler/binutils would
certainly allow fixing things by adding the missing '*'.
> > gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux-2.4.4-ac/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -march=i686 -malign-functions=4 -c -o pci-pc.o pci-pc.c
> > pci-pc.c:964: warning: `pci_fixup_via691' defined but not used
> > pci-pc.c:977: warning: `pci_fixup_via691_2' defined but not used
> > {standard input}: Assembler messages:
> > {standard input}:747: Warning: indirect lcall without `*'
> > {standard input}:832: Warning: indirect lcall without `*'
> > {standard input}:919: Warning: indirect lcall without `*'
> > {standard input}:958: Warning: indirect lcall without `*'
...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-05-17 18:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-05-17 16:45 Alan Cox
2001-05-17 17:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2001-05-17 17:36 ` Alan Cox
2001-05-17 17:16 ` Chris Evans
2001-05-17 17:37 ` Rik van Riel
2001-05-17 17:47 ` Mike Galbraith
2001-05-17 21:03 ` Rik van Riel
2001-05-18 3:55 ` Sasi Peter
2001-05-18 4:03 ` Rik van Riel
2001-05-18 6:06 ` Mike Galbraith
2001-05-18 17:08 ` Rik van Riel
2001-05-18 17:45 ` Mike Galbraith
2001-05-18 18:19 ` Ingo Oeser
2001-05-18 18:23 ` Rik van Riel
2001-05-18 18:58 ` Ingo Oeser
2001-05-18 20:12 ` Rik van Riel
2001-05-18 20:24 ` Mike Galbraith
2001-05-18 20:09 ` Mike Galbraith
2001-05-18 22:44 ` Rik van Riel
2001-05-18 22:58 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2001-05-19 2:12 ` Rik van Riel
2001-05-19 2:32 ` Mike Castle
2001-05-19 6:45 ` Mike Galbraith
2001-05-19 4:40 ` Mike Galbraith
2001-05-19 17:13 ` [RFC][PATCH] " Mike Galbraith
2001-05-19 21:41 ` Rik van Riel
2001-05-20 3:29 ` Mike Galbraith
2001-05-20 6:42 ` Rik van Riel
2001-05-20 8:08 ` Mike Galbraith
2001-05-20 8:49 ` Rik van Riel
2001-05-20 9:47 ` Mike Galbraith
2001-05-20 10:04 ` Rik van Riel
2001-05-21 13:36 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2001-05-20 21:54 ` Pavel Machek
2001-05-21 20:32 ` David Weinehall
2001-05-23 15:34 ` Rik van Riel
2001-05-25 8:39 ` Pavel Machek
2001-05-23 17:24 ` Jonathan Morton
2001-05-23 17:51 ` Scott Anderson
2001-05-25 8:10 ` David Weinehall
2001-05-25 18:39 ` Pavel Machek
2001-06-04 19:22 ` RPM Installation - Compilation errors jalaja devi
2001-05-24 8:48 ` [RFC][PATCH] Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac10 Mike Galbraith
2001-05-24 9:10 ` Rik van Riel
2001-05-24 10:32 ` Mike Galbraith
2001-05-24 11:03 ` Rik van Riel
2001-05-24 14:23 ` Mike Galbraith
2001-05-20 15:32 ` Ingo Oeser
2001-05-20 17:38 ` Mike Galbraith
2001-05-20 13:44 ` Zlatko Calusic
2001-05-20 17:58 ` Mike Galbraith
2001-05-20 19:32 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-05-20 21:37 ` Rik van Riel
2001-05-21 3:44 ` Mike Galbraith
2001-05-20 21:03 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-05-21 3:54 ` Mike Galbraith
2001-05-17 17:26 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2001-05-17 18:33 ` Udo A. Steinberg
2001-05-17 18:40 ` Matti Aarnio
2001-05-17 18:51 ` Matti Aarnio [this message]
2001-05-17 19:21 ` Alan Cox
2001-05-17 18:46 ` Ingo Oeser
2001-05-17 19:00 ` J . A . Magallon
2001-05-17 19:05 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-05-17 19:26 ` Alan Cox
2001-05-17 20:52 ` Linux 2.4.4-ac10: Oops FAVRE Gregoire
2001-05-17 21:41 ` Alan Cox
2001-05-18 11:28 ` FAVRE Gregoire
2001-05-18 8:12 Linux 2.4.4-ac10 David Balazic
2001-05-18 8:51 ` André Dahlqvist
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010517215133.J5947@mea-ext.zmailer.org \
--to=matti.aarnio@zmailer.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=reality@delusion.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®