From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 18 May 2001 04:51:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 18 May 2001 04:51:29 -0400 Received: from maila.telia.com ([194.22.194.231]:25564 "EHLO maila.telia.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 18 May 2001 04:51:21 -0400 Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 10:51:51 +0200 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9?= Dahlqvist To: David Balazic Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac10 Message-ID: <20010518105150.C1150@sm.luth.se> Mail-Followup-To: David Balazic , alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" In-Reply-To: <3B04D96B.FCDA69E9@uni-mb.si> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.17i In-Reply-To: <3B04D96B.FCDA69E9@uni-mb.si>; from david.balazic@uni-mb.si on Fri, May 18, 2001 at 10:12:27AM +0200 X-Unexpected-Header: The Spanish Inquisition Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org David Balazic wrote: > What old old binutils ? > Isn't there a clear requirement for a minimum binutils version in > Documentation/Changes ( or maybe it is README ... ) ? Yes there is. From the Changes file: o binutils 2.9.1.0.25 # ld -v -- André Dahlqvist