From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 18 May 2001 18:06:01 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 18 May 2001 18:05:52 -0400 Received: from www.topmail.de ([212.255.16.226]:45485 "HELO www.topmail.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Fri, 18 May 2001 18:05:45 -0400 From: mirabilos To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: CML 1 is ok Message-Id: <20010518220028.B139BA5AD65@www.topmail.de> Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 00:00:28 +0200 (MET DST) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sorry, no gpm, so handquoting: - CML 1 works ok for me too - menuconfig is great it requires ncurses, but _this_ piece of software almost anyone has. and if not I use make [old]config. - xconfig I never tested. - python what's that? - upgrading gcc - 2.7.2.3 was ok, egcs and 2.9x I dont like. So I wait for 3.0 (which seems better). netfilter: I _liked_ ipfwadm because I hate to always re-learn when a new kernel comes out. our company will soon ship a product still using ipfwadm (I started with 2.0.33, going to .36 and 2.4.0-testX). It's a pity this M$ism to not support it forever (they just stopped supporting DOS! and GW-BASIC *snief*) -mirabilos PS: Don't answer plz as I'll be offline for a time. _And_ I mean this honest, even it might considered sp.m -- by telnet