From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 19 May 2001 12:45:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 19 May 2001 12:45:37 -0400 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:8973 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 19 May 2001 12:45:23 -0400 Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 17:44:30 +0100 From: Matthew Wilcox To: Alan Cox Cc: Ben LaHaise , Alexander Viro , Andrew Morton , Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl, torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFD w/info-PATCH] device arguments from lookup, partion code Message-ID: <20010519174430.B23718@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk on Sat, May 19, 2001 at 05:25:22PM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, May 19, 2001 at 05:25:22PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > Only to an English speaker. I suspect Quebec City canadians would prefer a > different command set. Should we support `pas387' as well as `no387' as a kernel boot parameter then? Face it, a sysadmin has to know the limited subset of english which is used to configure a kernel. -- Revolutions do not require corporate support.