mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Oeser <ingo.oeser@informatik.tu-chemnitz.de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Ben LaHaise <bcrl@redhat.com>, Alexander Viro <viro@math.psu.edu>,
	Andrew Morton <andrewm@uow.edu.au>,
	Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFD w/info-PATCH] device arguments from lookup, partion code
Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 00:34:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010520003400.N754@nightmaster.csn.tu-chemnitz.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1519Xe-00005c-00@the-village.bc.nu> <Pine.LNX.4.21.0105191132420.14472-100000@penguin.transmeta.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0105191132420.14472-100000@penguin.transmeta.com>; from torvalds@transmeta.com on Sat, May 19, 2001 at 11:34:48AM -0700

On Sat, May 19, 2001 at 11:34:48AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
[Reasons]
> So the "English is bad" argument is a complete non-argument.

Jepp, I have to agree. 

English is used more or less as an communication protocol in
computer science and for operating computers.

Once you know how to operate an computer in English, you can
operate nearly every computer in the world, because they have
English as default locale.

Let's not repeat Babel please :-(

PS: English is neither mine, nor Linus native language. Why do
   the English natives complain instead of us? ;-)

<off topic side note>
   And be glad that's not German, that has this role. English
   sentences are WAY easier to parse by computers, because it
   doesn't use much suffixes and prefixes on words and has very
   few exceptions. Also these exceptions are eleminated from
   command languages WITHOUT influencing readability and
   comprehensability.
</off topic side note>


Regards

Ingo Oeser
-- 
To the systems programmer,
users and applications serve only to provide a test load.

  reply	other threads:[~2001-05-19 22:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 78+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-05-19 11:09 [RFD w/info-PATCH] device arguments from lookup, partion code in userspace Andries.Brouwer
2001-05-19 11:43 ` Andrew Morton
2001-05-19 12:00   ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-19 12:06     ` [RFD w/info-PATCH] device arguments from lookup, partion codein userspace Andrew Morton
2001-05-19 15:56     ` [RFD w/info-PATCH] device arguments from lookup, partion code in userspace Ben LaHaise
2001-05-19 16:25       ` [RFD w/info-PATCH] device arguments from lookup, partion code Alan Cox
2001-05-19 16:36         ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-19 16:44         ` Matthew Wilcox
2001-05-19 18:01         ` Nicolas Pitre
2001-05-19 18:34         ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-19 22:34           ` Ingo Oeser [this message]
2001-05-19 23:42             ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-20  0:11               ` Alan Cox
2001-05-20 17:10             ` Padraig Brady
2001-05-20 19:53         ` Pavel Machek
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-05-19  8:30 [RFD w/info-PATCH] device arguments from lookup, partion code inuserspace Alexander Viro
2001-05-19 14:02 ` [RFD w/info-PATCH] device arguments from lookup, partion code Alan Cox
2001-05-19 16:48   ` Erik Mouw
2001-05-19 17:45     ` Aaron Lehmann
2001-05-19 19:38       ` Erik Mouw
2001-05-19 20:53         ` Steven Walter
2001-05-19 18:51 ` Richard Gooch
2001-05-20  2:18   ` Matthew Wilcox
2001-05-20  2:22   ` Richard Gooch
2001-05-20  2:34     ` Matthew Wilcox
2001-05-20  2:36     ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-20  2:48     ` Richard Gooch
2001-05-20  3:26       ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-20 10:23         ` Russell King
2001-05-20 10:35           ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-20 18:46           ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-20 18:57             ` Russell King
2001-05-20 19:10               ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-20 19:42                 ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-20 20:07                   ` Alan Cox
2001-05-20 20:33                     ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-20 23:59                     ` Paul Fulghum
2001-05-21  0:36                       ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-21  3:08                         ` Paul Fulghum
2001-05-20 20:07                   ` Alan Cox
2001-05-20 23:46                   ` Ingo Molnar
2001-05-21  0:32                     ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-21  3:12                     ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-21 19:32                       ` Kai Henningsen
2001-05-23  1:15                       ` Albert D. Cahalan
2001-05-20  2:51     ` Richard Gooch
2001-05-20 21:13       ` Pavel Machek
2001-05-21 20:20         ` Alan Cox
2001-05-21 20:41           ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-21 21:29             ` Alan Cox
2001-05-21 21:51               ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-21 21:56                 ` Alan Cox
2001-05-21 22:10                   ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-21 22:22                     ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-22 15:41                       ` Oliver Xymoron
2001-05-22  2:28                     ` Paul Mackerras
2001-05-22 13:33                     ` Jan Harkes
2001-05-22 16:30                       ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-22  0:22                 ` Ingo Oeser
2001-05-22  0:57                   ` Matthew Wilcox
2001-05-22  1:13                     ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-22  1:18                       ` Matthew Wilcox
2001-05-22  7:49                         ` Alan Cox
2001-05-22 15:31                           ` Matthew Wilcox
2001-05-22 15:31                             ` Alan Cox
2001-05-22 15:38                               ` Matthew Wilcox
2001-05-22 15:42                                 ` Alan Cox
2001-05-20  2:31   ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-20 16:57   ` David Woodhouse
2001-05-20 19:02     ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-20 19:11       ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-20 19:18         ` Matthew Wilcox
2001-05-20 19:24           ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-20 19:34             ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-20 19:27         ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-20 19:33           ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-20 19:38             ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-20 19:57       ` David Woodhouse
2001-05-21 13:57       ` Ingo Oeser

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20010520003400.N754@nightmaster.csn.tu-chemnitz.de \
    --to=ingo.oeser@informatik.tu-chemnitz.de \
    --cc=Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=andrewm@uow.edu.au \
    --cc=bcrl@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
    --cc=viro@math.psu.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®