From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 22 May 2001 08:12:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 22 May 2001 08:12:39 -0400 Received: from mgw-x3.nokia.com ([131.228.20.26]:44795 "EHLO mgw-x3.nokia.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 22 May 2001 08:12:28 -0400 Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 14:55:53 +0300 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Q about ip_local_deliver_finish Message-ID: <20010522145553.A619@Hews1193nrc> In-Reply-To: <20010522143407.A590@Hews1193nrc> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.17i In-Reply-To: <20010522143407.A590@Hews1193nrc>; from alexey.vyskubov@nokia.com on Tue, May 22, 2001 at 02:34:07PM +0300 From: alexey.vyskubov@nokia.com (Alexey Vyskubov) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > If I understand correctly it means that if we have two different protocols > with the same (modulo MAX_INET_PROTOS) protocol number then > ip_local_deliver will return the return value of ipprot->handler for the > first protocol in the chain > inet_protos[protocol number modulo MAX_INET_PROTOS] and *always zero* for the > second. Why? Is it a bug or I just do not understand something? Of course I mean the return value for protocol handler if the chain contains only one protcol and *always zero* if the chain contains several protocols. -- Alexey