From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 23 May 2001 10:40:05 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 23 May 2001 10:39:55 -0400 Received: from ns.suse.de ([213.95.15.193]:35087 "HELO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 23 May 2001 10:39:39 -0400 Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 16:38:43 +0200 From: Andi Kleen To: sebastien person Cc: liste noyau linux Subject: Re: [timer] max timeout Message-ID: <20010523163843.A24721@gruyere.muc.suse.de> In-Reply-To: <20010523162801.38dabdff.sebastien.person@sycomore.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010523162801.38dabdff.sebastien.person@sycomore.fr>; from sebastien.person@sycomore.fr on Wed, May 23, 2001 at 04:28:01PM +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 04:28:01PM +0200, sebastien person wrote: > Is it bad to do the following call ? > > mod_timer(&timer, jiffies+(0.1*HZ)); Yes very bad. gcc will generate a floating point add for that, corrupting the user process' floating point context. -Andi