From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 23 May 2001 10:41:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 23 May 2001 10:41:45 -0400 Received: from ns.suse.de ([213.95.15.193]:52495 "HELO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 23 May 2001 10:41:31 -0400 Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 16:40:36 +0200 From: Andi Kleen To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?christophe_barb=E9?= Cc: Andi Kleen , lkml Subject: Re: sk_buff destructor in 2.2.18 Message-ID: <20010523164036.A24809@gruyere.muc.suse.de> In-Reply-To: <20010523161654.C7531@pc8.lineo.fr> <20010523162739.A24463@gruyere.muc.suse.de> <20010523163758.C7823@pc8.lineo.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010523163758.C7823@pc8.lineo.fr>; from christophe.barbe@lineo.fr on Wed, May 23, 2001 at 04:37:58PM +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 04:37:58PM +0200, christophe barbé wrote: > It seems to not be the case, because my destructor is called. It is called, but you overwrote the kernel destructor and therefore broke the socket memory accounting completely; causing all kinds of problems. > Could you point me the code where you think this method is already used? net/core/sock.c -Andi