mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: Oliver Neukum <Oliver.Neukum@lrz.uni-muenchen.de>
Cc: Keith Owens <kaos@ocs.com.au>,
	Andreas Dilger <adilger@turbolinux.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [CHECKER] large stack variables (>=1K) in 2.4.4 and 2.4.4-ac8
Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 16:07:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010525160729.B32273@gruyere.muc.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <24688.990773627@kao2.melbourne.sgi.com> <01052516035700.01561@idun>
In-Reply-To: <01052516035700.01561@idun>; from Oliver.Neukum@lrz.uni-muenchen.de on Fri, May 25, 2001 at 04:03:57PM +0200

On Fri, May 25, 2001 at 04:03:57PM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > A small overflow of the kernel stack overwrites the struct task at the
> > bottom of the stack, recovery is dubious at best because we rely on
> > data in struct task.  A large overflow of the kernel stack either
> > corrupts the storage below this task's stack, which could hit anything,
> > or it gets a stack fault.
> 
> Is there a reason for the task structure to be at the bottom rather than the 
> top of these two pages ?

This way you save one addition for every current access; which adds to 
quite a few KB over the complete kernel. 

-Andi

  reply	other threads:[~2001-05-25 14:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-05-24 21:10 Dawson Engler
2001-05-24 22:40 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2001-05-24 23:08 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-05-24 23:33   ` Andi Kleen
2001-05-25  5:20     ` Keith Owens
2001-05-25  6:33       ` Andreas Dilger
2001-05-25  6:53         ` Keith Owens
2001-05-25  8:20           ` Andi Kleen
2001-05-25  8:31             ` Keith Owens
2001-05-25  8:39               ` Andi Kleen
2001-05-25 14:03           ` Oliver Neukum
2001-05-25 14:07             ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2001-05-25 15:45               ` dean gaudet
2001-05-25 16:34                 ` Jonathan Lundell
2001-05-25 18:37                   ` dean gaudet
2001-05-25 17:49                     ` Jeff Dike
2001-05-25  7:11       ` David Welch
2001-05-25  8:08         ` Keith Owens
2001-05-25 15:31         ` dean gaudet
2001-05-25 15:49           ` Keith Owens
2001-05-25 18:46             ` dean gaudet
2001-05-25  8:14       ` Andi Kleen
2001-05-25  8:25         ` Keith Owens
2001-05-25  8:27           ` Andi Kleen
2001-05-25  8:37             ` Keith Owens
2001-05-25  8:17       ` Andi Kleen
2001-05-25 11:52     ` Brian Gerst
2001-05-25 11:53       ` Andi Kleen
2001-05-25 12:07         ` Brian Gerst
2001-05-25  3:38   ` Andrew Morton
2001-05-24 23:01 Mikael Pettersson
2001-05-25  2:48 ` Dawson Engler
2001-05-25  3:00   ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-25  3:07     ` Dawson Engler
2001-05-25  4:23 Dunlap, Randy
2001-07-03  9:15 VDA

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20010525160729.B32273@gruyere.muc.suse.de \
    --to=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=Oliver.Neukum@lrz.uni-muenchen.de \
    --cc=adilger@turbolinux.com \
    --cc=kaos@ocs.com.au \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®