From: Martin von Loewis <loewis@informatik.hu-berlin.de>
To: aia21@cam.ac.uk
Cc: jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Linux-ntfs@tiger.informatik.hu-berlin.de,
linux-ntfs-dev@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Linux-ntfs] Re: [Linux-NTFS-Dev] Re: ANN: NTFS new release available (1.1.15)
Date: Sun, 27 May 2001 13:23:00 +0200 (MEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200105271123.NAA21828@pandora.informatik.hu-berlin.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20010526011903.00aab050@pop.cus.cam.ac.uk> (message from Anton Altaparmakov on Sat, 26 May 2001 01:42:20 +0100)
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20010526000503.04716ec0@pop.cus.cam.ac.uk> <5.1.0.14.2.20010526011903.00aab050@pop.cus.cam.ac.uk>
> I would love to move inode metadata to the page cache. That would simplify
> so much in the NTFS driver and would result in an incredible speed boost
> due to getting rid of all the silly copying of data back and forth inside
> the driver as we could just pass pointers around instead (to locked pages
> or other form of internal locking).
[...]
> No thank you. I would rather have it contiguous or at least logically
> contiguous. I don't care if the pages are physically contiguous as long as
> I can see them as one piece... I mean, ok, I could break up run lists, as
> they are arrays of fixed size structs and the boundary cases would be
> predictable
When you talk about avoiding copying, are you thinking of not copying
the runlists, as well? If so, how can you avoid uncompressing them?
That seems very complicated, plus you have to concatenate the pieces
of the runlist if they span multiple MFT records, anyway.
> They are not. They are derived from compressed on-disk structures (which
> are re-compressed when updating the inode). Runlists of such large size are
> only needed for A) huge files/directories, B) extremely fragmented
> files/directories, or C) a combination of A and B. (Remembering that
> metadata is stored as files, so the same applies for the metadata itself.)
I guess this answers my question - you will continue to uncompress the
runlist when opening the inode, right?
Regards,
Martin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-05-27 11:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-05-25 23:49 Anton Altaparmakov
2001-05-25 23:59 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-05-26 0:42 ` [Linux-NTFS-Dev] " Anton Altaparmakov
2001-05-27 11:23 ` Martin von Loewis [this message]
2001-05-27 11:45 ` [Linux-ntfs] " Anton Altaparmakov
2001-05-27 12:53 ` Martin von Loewis
2001-05-28 5:36 ` Yuri Per
2001-05-28 11:10 ` Martin von Loewis
2001-05-28 12:01 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2001-05-28 13:08 ` Yuri Per
2001-05-28 14:49 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2001-05-29 0:50 ` Jeff V. Merkey
2001-05-29 8:18 ` Martin von Loewis
2001-05-29 16:42 ` Jeff V. Merkey
2001-05-27 22:37 ` Anton Altaparmakov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200105271123.NAA21828@pandora.informatik.hu-berlin.de \
--to=loewis@informatik.hu-berlin.de \
--cc=Linux-ntfs@tiger.informatik.hu-berlin.de \
--cc=aia21@cam.ac.uk \
--cc=jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ntfs-dev@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®