From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 10 Jun 2001 19:40:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 10 Jun 2001 19:40:35 -0400 Received: from ns.suse.de ([213.95.15.193]:34575 "HELO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sun, 10 Jun 2001 19:40:23 -0400 Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 01:41:33 +0200 (CEST) From: egger@suse.de Reply-To: egger@suse.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.4.5-ac12] New Sony Vaio Motion Eye camera driver To: torvalds@transmeta.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <9g0ghj$1mb$1@penguin.transmeta.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-Id: <20010611014012.CB4ABA6C6@Nicole.muc.suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 10 Jun, Linus Torvalds wrote: > I've not figured out why the ATI Xv stuff from gatos seems to not have > made it into the XFree86 CVS tree - it works better than much of the > Xv stuff for some other chipsets that _are_ in the CVS tree. > I imported it into the XFree86 CVS some months ago, it was trivial. I > don't have the patches lying around any more, though. I can try to > re-create them if anybody needs help. Did it look endiansafe to you? The ATI Xv stuff from XFree86 4.1.0 produces psychadelic results for me on PPC. If it's supposed to work I'd really like to give it a try. Servus, Daniel