From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 12:38:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 12:38:27 -0400 Received: from web3503.mail.yahoo.com ([216.115.111.70]:45329 "HELO web3503.mail.yahoo.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 12:38:15 -0400 Message-ID: <20010611163813.24181.qmail@web3503.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 17:38:13 +0100 (BST) From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Mich=E8l=20Alexandre=20Salim?= Subject: Follow-up: Re: Clock drift on Transmeta Crusoe (Sony Vaio C1VE) To: Mark Hahn Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Seems to be a rather common problem and probably that is why only Mark Hahn has replied so far, but searching through Google most other computers seem to get a clock drift of only 1 minute per day at worst, and I have consistently seen my system clock doing 4 minutes a day slower than its hardware clock, my other PC and my VCR. This is rather odd, has anyone experienced anything like this on the Vaio Crusoe before? Regards, Michel --- Mark Hahn wrote: > > It is .. 32-bit I/O, multimode turned on, > read-ahead, > > DMA on. Does it affect the system clock in any > way? > > none of the rest matters as long as dma is on. the > issue > is whether other irq-handling interferes with > handling the > system clock tick. but I had the impression that > crusoe > provided TSC, or something like it. didn't you say > your problem only happens when compiled for notsc > (386)? > ____________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at http://mail.yahoo.co.uk or your free @yahoo.ie address at http://mail.yahoo.ie