From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 09:05:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 09:05:22 -0400 Received: from mailout01.sul.t-online.com ([194.25.134.80]:45319 "EHLO mailout01.sul.t-online.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 09:05:18 -0400 Message-Id: <200106141305.f5ED5hD00663@thunderbird.ncptiddische.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Nils Holland Organization: NightCastle Productions To: Linux kernel Subject: Re: obsolete code must die Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 15:05:43 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2.2] In-Reply-To: <27525795B28BD311B28D00500481B7601F1458@ftrs1.intranet.ftr.nl> In-Reply-To: <27525795B28BD311B28D00500481B7601F1458@ftrs1.intranet.ftr.nl> NCP-Opt: Powered by Linux MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 14 June 2001 12:22, Heusden, Folkert van wrote: > Yeah, and while you're at it: make it closed source and ask big time $$ > for every single line of update. > If your stupid idea will be followed, a lot of african people will not > be happy. (me neither. proud owner of a 486 (at home)) Well, although I am not involved in developement of the kernel, I'm pretty much about this "cleaning up" idea. While I'm not one of those folks who are actually working on the code, I don't see a reason for limiting the range of hardware that Linux suppurts, which is what this clean-up would do. Some ideas that have been presented here are not of much relevance to me, but I think dropping support for the serial and parallel ports is an insane idea. Why not also stop supporting other devices that are in use by probably 70% of the users? Besides the fact that Linux is free, stable and fast, I have always liked the fact that I could put it on almost any machine I got my hands on. That holds true to my fastest Athlon with 512 MB of RAM, as well as for a 486SX with 16 MB of RAM. With Linux, even such old machines could be put to good use. And now, after this suggested clean-up, I wouldn't even be able to use my non-USB supporting Pentium machines anymore. I wonder what that would be good for. I really cannot imagine that the older features in the kernel are big problems of any kind that make it impossible (or harder) for the developers to focus on supporting new features. The only thing a clean-up would do is probably making a whole lot of users unhappy. Greetings Nils -- ---------------------------------------------------------- Nils Holland - nils@nightcastleproductions.org NightCastle Productions - Linux in Tiddische, Germany http://www.nightcastleproductions.org "They asked me where this earthquake would begin, I offered to let them feel my pulse." ----------------------------------------------------------