From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 10:56:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 10:56:29 -0400 Received: from jalon.able.es ([212.97.163.2]:2946 "EHLO jalon.able.es") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 10:56:21 -0400 Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 16:57:38 +0200 From: "J . A . Magallon" To: Dan Kegel Cc: jamagallon@able.es, "linux-kernel @ vger . kernel . org" Subject: Re: accounting for threads Message-ID: <20010619165738.A16555@werewolf.able.es> In-Reply-To: <3B2F6759.6CF96382@kegel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT In-Reply-To: <3B2F6759.6CF96382@kegel.com>; from dank@kegel.com on Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 16:53:13 +0200 X-Mailer: Balsa 1.1.5 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 20010619 Dan Kegel wrote: > >Let me know if this helps. And anyone else, let me know if there's a simpler >way to do this. Should LinuxThreads be doing this under the hood, so it can >be a little closer to posix threads compliance? >- Dan He, I have just discovered that IRIX 6.2 times(2) also fails to account time for threads. 6.4 works fine. -- J.A. Magallon # Let the source be with you... mailto:jamagallon@able.es Linux Mandrake release 8.1 (Cooker) for i586 Linux werewolf 2.4.5-ac15 #2 SMP Sun Jun 17 02:12:45 CEST 2001 i686