From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 18:45:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 18:45:13 -0400 Received: from jalon.able.es ([212.97.163.2]:908 "EHLO jalon.able.es") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 18:44:53 -0400 Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 00:48:22 +0200 From: "J . A . Magallon" To: Sasi Peter Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [OT] gcc 2.95.2 vs. 3.0 (fwd) Message-ID: <20010625004822.C1799@werewolf.able.es> In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT In-Reply-To: ; from sape@iq.rulez.org on Sun, Jun 24, 2001 at 11:54:25 +0200 X-Mailer: Balsa 1.1.6-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 20010624 Sasi Peter wrote: > >I know opendivx code is not like kernel code at all, but on the other hand >it is well suited for benchmark testing. > > >test file: (opendivx with postprocessing, this stuff is written in C) ># mplayer -osdlevel 0 -nosound -benchmark 1800.avi -vo null -pp 15 >VIDEO: [divx] 640x352 24bpp 23.98 fps 1865.1 kbps (227.7 kbyte/s) > Sure it is opendivx ? I think you are just using gcc compiled code for the 'interface' and 'glue' to windows divx decoders (/usr/lib/win32/*.dll) that do the real hard work. Redo the tests with am MPEG2 movie. -- J.A. Magallon # Let the source be with you... mailto:jamagallon@able.es Mandrake Linux release 8.1 (Cooker) for i586 Linux werewolf 2.4.5-ac17 #2 SMP Fri Jun 22 01:36:07 CEST 2001 i686