From: Will <will@egregious.net>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] skb destructor enhancement idea
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 15:50:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010625155016.B17735@egregious.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010618134644.A5938@egregious.net> <20010618145331.A32166@wacko.asicdesigners.com> <20010621161349.A27654@egregious.net> <20010625140613.A17207@egregious.net> <15159.48229.326223.682824@pizda.ninka.net>
In-Reply-To: <15159.48229.326223.682824@pizda.ninka.net>; from davem@redhat.com on Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 03:34:13PM -0700
David S. Miller wrote:
> I think the idea totally stinks.
The idea, or just the performance implications of my particular implementation? If
this could be done without a global spinlock would you still object to the
construction of the small linked list in each skb?
> Add an ifdef and the knobs you need to the skb struct directly just
> like netfilter does.
So I should #ifdef throughout the tcp and socket code wherever skb's 'destructor' is
called to call mine as well? And multiply that by N driver writers who'd like to do
the same thing? Sounds messy...
--
-Will :: AD6XL :: http://tyranny.egregious.net/~will/
Orton :: finger will@tyranny.egregious.net for GPG public key
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-06-25 22:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20010618134644.A5938@egregious.net>
[not found] ` <20010618145331.A32166@wacko.asicdesigners.com>
[not found] ` <20010621161349.A27654@egregious.net>
2001-06-25 21:06 ` Will
2001-06-25 22:34 ` David S. Miller
2001-06-25 22:50 ` Will [this message]
2001-06-26 8:35 ` When the FUD is all around (sniff) Luigi Genoni
2001-06-26 12:33 ` Alessandro Suardi
2001-06-26 12:34 ` Alan Cox
2001-06-26 14:59 ` [OT] " Jordan Crouse
2001-06-26 15:02 ` Alan Cox
2001-06-26 15:09 ` Jonathan Lundell
2001-06-26 17:41 ` Rob Landley
2001-06-26 15:28 ` Luigi Genoni
2001-06-26 15:06 ` Jonathan Lundell
2001-06-26 22:47 ` lk
2001-06-27 12:44 ` Marco Colombo
2001-06-26 14:19 ` Stephen Satchell
2001-06-26 14:38 ` Stephen Satchell
2001-06-26 15:16 ` Jonathan Corbet
2001-06-26 16:43 ` Rik van Riel
2001-06-26 17:00 ` Kip Macy
2001-06-27 21:08 ` Fabrice Gautier
2001-06-25 23:12 ` [PATCH] skb destructor enhancement idea David S. Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010625155016.B17735@egregious.net \
--to=will@egregious.net \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®