mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jesse Pollard <pollard@tomcat.admin.navo.hpc.mil>
To: landley@webofficenow.com, <asmith@14inverleith.freeserve.co.uk>,
	Kai Henningsen <kaih@khms.westfalen.de>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<penguicon-comphist@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [comphist] Re: Microsoft and Xenix.
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 08:26:55 -0500 (CDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200106271326.IAA03158@tomcat.admin.navo.hpc.mil> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <01062610445301.12583@localhost.localdomain>

Rob Landley <landley@webofficenow.com>:
> On Monday 25 June 2001 16:19, asmith@14inverleith.freeserve.co.uk wrote:
...
> > I learnt my computing on a PDP8/E with papertape punch/reader, RALF,
> > Fortran II, then later 2.4Mb removable cartridges (RK05 I think).  toggling
> > in the bootstrap improved your concentration. Much later you could
> > get a single chip(?) version of this in a wee knee sized box.
> 
> "A quarter century of unix" mentions RK05 cartridges several times, but never 
> says much ABOUT them.
> 
> Okay, so they're 2.4 megabyte removable cartridges?  How big?  Are they tapes 
> or disk packs?  (I.E. can you run off of them or are they just storage?)  I 
> know lots of early copies of unix were sent out from Bell Labs on RK05 
> cartidges signed "love, ken"...

Ah, the memories... (apologies for the interruptions, but just had too ...)

RK05 cartriges looked very similar to a floppy case the size of an old 78 RPM
record (about 12 inches across, 2 - 3 inches high). I never used them, but
I did see them. They were among the first disk drives DEC ever made. Not the
first (I think that was a DF-32 for PDP 8 systems with 32 K bytes of disk
space). The raw storage was reported as 2.5 MB, formatted was ~2.4MB, with
two recording surfaces. The drive looked very similar to a modern CD drive
that would fit in about a 3U (ummm 4U?) 19 inch rack. It had 2 recording
surfaces. It did have a write enable/disable switch. If I remember right
these were originally made for the PDP 11/10-20 systems used for laboratory
device control - chromatographs were mentioned by the chemistry department
back in school.

I may have an old DEC peripheral specification book at home (11/45 version).
I really liked those books that DEC used to put out. If you ever needed to
program a DEC interface, that book had everything. It was almost like the
engineers were bragging about how easy the interfaces were to program.

> What was that big reel to reel tape they always show in movies, anyway?

I think they were CDC transports.

> I need a weekend just to collate stuff...
> 
> > One summer job was working on a PDP15 analog computer alongside an 11/20
> > with DECTAPE, trying to compute missile firing angles. [A simple version of
> > Pres Bush's starwars shield].
> 
> Considering that the Mark I was designed to compute tables of artillery 
> firing angles during World War II...  It's a distinct trend, innit?  And the 
> source of the game "artillery duel", of course...

Or the 11/34 version of the Lunar Lander (load from paper tape, graphics
display on VT11 - 512x512 8 bit color). It used to be distributed as a
diagnostic tool (hardware level interrupts, dual A/D conversion via joystick,
I/O via VT11). Any memory, DMA, or bus configuration errors would hang
the system with a known diagnostic one-liner message explaining the problem.

I also saw a report of a "terminal warfare" event where the graphics display
was being used for text editing when two little stick figure men would walk
onto the display, pick up a line, and then walk off the screen. There was
nothing the user could do until it finished. The text buffer wasn't touched,
only the display buffer.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jesse I Pollard, II
Email: pollard@navo.hpc.mil

Any opinions expressed are solely my own.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2001-06-27 13:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-06-24  2:41 Wayne.Brown
2001-06-24  3:07 ` Mike Castle
2001-06-24 14:44   ` Rob Landley
2001-06-25 15:13     ` Joel Jaeggli
2001-06-25 14:17       ` Rob Landley
2001-06-25 19:57         ` Erik Mouw
2001-06-27  2:10         ` Steve Underwood
2001-06-25 19:30   ` Kai Henningsen
2001-06-25 20:19     ` asmith
2001-06-26 14:44       ` [comphist] " Rob Landley
2001-06-26 20:52         ` Alan Cox
2001-06-26 21:21         ` Michael Meissner
2001-06-27 13:26         ` Jesse Pollard [this message]
2001-06-27 23:35           ` [OT] " Guest section DW
2001-06-26 20:49       ` Jonathan Lundell
2001-06-24 14:32 ` Rob Landley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200106271326.IAA03158@tomcat.admin.navo.hpc.mil \
    --to=pollard@tomcat.admin.navo.hpc.mil \
    --cc=asmith@14inverleith.freeserve.co.uk \
    --cc=kaih@khms.westfalen.de \
    --cc=landley@webofficenow.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=penguicon-comphist@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®