From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 19:17:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 19:17:34 -0400 Received: from samba.sourceforge.net ([198.186.203.85]:26374 "HELO lists.samba.org") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 19:17:25 -0400 Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 09:17:04 +1000 To: Jeff Garzik Cc: tom_gall@vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: RFC: Changes for PCI Message-ID: <20010628091704.B23627@krispykreme> In-Reply-To: <3B3A58FC.2728DAFF@vnet.ibm.com> <3B3A5B00.9FF387C9@mandrakesoft.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3B3A5B00.9FF387C9@mandrakesoft.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.18i From: anton@samba.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Why not use sysdata like the other arches? > > Changing the meaning of dev->bus->number globally seems pointless. If > you are going to do that, just do it the right way and introduce another > struct member, pci_domain or somesuch. Thats 2.5 material. For 2.4 we should do as davem suggested and make the bus number unique. I do this by just adding 256 to each overlapping host bridge. Anton