From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S265868AbRF2L5a>; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 07:57:30 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S265871AbRF2L5U>; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 07:57:20 -0400
Received: from metastasis.f00f.org ([203.167.249.89]:22913 "HELO weta.f00f.org")
	by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id <S265868AbRF2L5F>;
	Fri, 29 Jun 2001 07:57:05 -0400
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 23:56:19 +1200
To: Christopher Smith <x@xman.org>
Cc: Dan Maas <dmaas@dcine.com>, John Fremlin <vii@users.sourceforge.net>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: A signal fairy tale
Message-ID: <20010629235619.A11379@weta.f00f.org>
In-Reply-To: <fa.d69j5vv.ej8irj@ifi.uio.no> <fa.h2rpibv.87m5bp@ifi.uio.no> <5.1.0.14.0.20010629012354.02b759d0@imap.xman.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.0.20010629012354.02b759d0@imap.xman.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.18i
From: cw@f00f.org (Chris Wedgwood)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 01:26:29AM -0700, Christopher Smith wrote:

> P.S.: What do you mean by explicit binding between event queues and
> threads? I'm not sure I see what this gains you.

Cache affinity presumably?



  --cw