mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guenter Millahn <Guenter.Millahn@Informatik.TU-Cottbus.DE>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
Cc: Aaron Lehmann <aaronl@vitelus.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jakub@redhat.com
Subject: Re: Linux speed on sun4c
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2001 17:59:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010703175922.A7970@pt.Informatik.TU-Cottbus.DE> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010630220612.C14361@vitelus.com> <15166.50418.583094.554723@pizda.ninka.net>
In-Reply-To: <15166.50418.583094.554723@pizda.ninka.net>

On Sat, 30 Jun 2001, David S. Miller wrote:

> Aaron Lehmann writes:
>  > NetBSD/Sparc's FAQ asserts:
>  > 
>  >     Why is NetBSD so much faster than SparcLinux on sun4c (top) 
>  > 
>  >         The memory management hardware on sun4c machines (SPARCStation
>  >         1, 1+, 2, IPC, IPX, SLC, ELC and clones) is not handled particularly
>  >         well by Linux. Until Linux reworks their MMU code NetBSD will be very
>  >         much faster on this hardware. 
>  > 
>  > Was there ever any truth to this statement? It seems to be light on
>  > technical details. Have these purported issues ever been fixed?
>  > 
>  > I don't want to be scared into running NetBSD on my SparcStation 2 :D.


What about OpenBSD?  Same as NetBSD?



> It's totally true, use *BSD on your sun4c systems if top performance
> is your desire. :-)
> 
> I know how to fix it but frankly I have no desire to work on
> that platform any more.
> 
> Later,
> David S. Miller
> davem@redhat.com


David, can you publish your idea for a fix? Possibly anybody elese can make
the patch?

Thanks, Guenter

-- 
Dipl.-Ing. Guenter Millahn         Brandenburg University of Technology
Systems, Network & DB Admin        CS Dept / DB & IS Research Group
Voice: +49 (355) 69-2272/2700      P.O. Box: 10 13 44
Fax:   +49 (355) 69-2766           D-03013 Cottbus              GERMANY

"The real world is still far away from be led ad absurdum by the virtual
one."    (Hal Faber, newsreel "What happened, what will be", 08/13/2000)

  reply	other threads:[~2001-07-03 15:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-07-01  5:06 Aaron Lehmann
2001-07-01  6:36 ` David S. Miller
2001-07-03 15:59   ` Guenter Millahn [this message]
2001-07-03 23:07   ` David S. Miller
2004-10-21 11:33     ` Nico Schottelius

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20010703175922.A7970@pt.Informatik.TU-Cottbus.DE \
    --to=guenter.millahn@informatik.tu-cottbus.de \
    --cc=aaronl@vitelus.com \
    --cc=davem@redhat.com \
    --cc=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®