Re: new IPC mechanism ideas

[Rajeev Bector <rajeev_bector@yahoo.com>]

The point is that you can do IPC using
this scheme which is
1) protected (as compared to a shared
   memory (shm) scheme in which any process
   can write anywhere and corrupt
   everything)

2) involves only 1 copy.

Thanks,
Rajeev

--- "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@transmeta.com> wrote:
> Rajeev Bector wrote:
> > 
> > If your driver is in the kernel,
> > then you dont need that. All processes
> > use system-calls (or ioctls) to send
> > messages and when they do recv(),
> > they get a pointer to a location
> > (where they are mapped to via mmap)
> > and they can read directly. In this
> > scheme, you dont need any traditional
> > UNIX IPC mechanism to work.
> > 
> 
> And the point of this is?
> 
> 	-hpa
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
> "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at 
> http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/