From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 20 Jul 2001 16:15:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 20 Jul 2001 16:14:58 -0400 Received: from [200.255.3.131] ([200.255.3.131]:36612 "EHLO olimpo.networx.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id convert rfc822-to-8bit; Fri, 20 Jul 2001 16:14:41 -0400 Message-Id: <200107202013.RAA02434@olimpo.networx.com.br> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Thiago Vinhas de Moraes To: Subject: Linux 2.5 Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 17:08:58 -0300 X-Mailer: NetWorx Mail v1.0 Cc: torvalds@transmeta.com, alan@redhat.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing Hello all! I just would like to know what's missing to the start of the development of the kernel 2.5, and the mantaince of the 2.4 to go to Alan Cox ? I'm asking this because I see a very good stability of the 2.4 tree, and the need of the start of the development of 2.5. Currently, 2.4 is just getting small fixes, that could be easily managed by Alan. Does Linus have any schedule to pass the control of 2.4 management to someone else, and start developing the great 2.5 kernel? Regards, Thiago Vinhas