From: klink@clouddancer.com (Colonel)
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kaboom@gatech.edu, chris.ricker@genetics.utah.edu
Subject: Re: 2.4.7 tmpfs strange behaviour
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 20:22:56 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010725032256.D3F0F785B8@mail.clouddancer.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9jl7as$a2h$1@ns1.clouddancer.com>
In-Reply-To: <20010725005940.A5607@werewolf.able.es> <w53bsm9c06f.wl@megaela.fe.dis.titech.ac.jp> <20010725025014.A2431@werewolf.able.es> <20010725032634.A1175@werewolf.able.es> <20010725025014.A2431@werewolf.able.es>; from jamagallon@able.es on Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 02:50:14 +0200 <9jl7as$a2h$1@ns1.clouddancer.com>
In clouddancer.list.kernel, you wrote:
>
>On 20010725 J . A . Magallon wrote:
>>
>>On 20010725 GOTO Masanori wrote:
>>>> /dev/sdb1 4232960 32840 4200120 1% /mnt/disk
>>>> /root/tmpfs 131072 0 131072 0% /dev/shm
>>>> /tmp/tmpfs 131072 0 131072 0% /dev/shm
>>>>
>>>> ???? Strange devices.... both mounted under /dev/shm.
>>>
>>>I don't have any problems... mount version is 2.11g on 2.4.7
>>>Uni-Processor and 2.4.7-pre3 SMP.
>>>
>>
>>Mmm, mine is mount-2.11e on 2.4.7 final, SMP box.
>>perhaps mount bug ?
>>Going to get the new one...
>>
>
>Right, mount bug. Version 2.11h works fine...
>
>--
>J.A. Magallon # Let the source be with you...
>mailto:jamagallon@able.es
>Mandrake Linux release 8.1 (Cooker) for i586
This means an update to the Changes documentation. It lists 2.10o as
the minimum.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-07-25 3:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <9jl7as$a2h$1@ns1.clouddancer.com>
2001-07-24 22:59 ` J . A . Magallon
2001-07-25 0:38 ` GOTO Masanori
2001-07-25 0:50 ` J . A . Magallon
2001-07-25 1:26 ` J . A . Magallon
2001-07-25 3:22 ` Colonel [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010725032256.D3F0F785B8@mail.clouddancer.com \
--to=klink@clouddancer.com \
--cc=chris.ricker@genetics.utah.edu \
--cc=kaboom@gatech.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®