From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S268895AbRHBLfn>; Thu, 2 Aug 2001 07:35:43 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S268896AbRHBLfW>; Thu, 2 Aug 2001 07:35:22 -0400
Received: from ha1.rdc2.nsw.optushome.com.au ([203.164.2.50]:22775 "EHLO
	mss.rdc2.nsw.optushome.com.au") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S268895AbRHBLfN>; Thu, 2 Aug 2001 07:35:13 -0400
From: Manfred Bartz <mbartz@optushome.com.au>
Message-ID: <20010802100456.796.qmail@optushome.com.au>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Ridiculously OT] Virii (sic)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0108020828080.6003-100000@infradead.org>
In-Reply-To: Riley Williams's message of "Thu, 2 Aug 2001 08:33:05 +0100 (BST)"
Organization: yes
Date: 02 Aug 2001 20:04:56 +1000
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) XEmacs/21.1 (Bryce Canyon)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

>  >> plural of virus is virii. 

Huh?

I really don't know much Latin, but the plural of virus is viri.
Virii would be the plural of virius if there were such a thing.