From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 2 Aug 2001 11:13:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 2 Aug 2001 11:13:30 -0400 Received: from h-207-228-73-44.gen.cadvision.com ([207.228.73.44]:14095 "EHLO mobilix.ras.ucalgary.ca") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 2 Aug 2001 11:13:25 -0400 Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2001 09:13:23 -0600 Message-Id: <200108021513.f72FDNZ18683@mobilix.ras.ucalgary.ca> From: Richard Gooch To: Alan Cox Cc: dougg@torque.net (Douglas Gilbert), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFT] Support for ~2144 SCSI discs In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Alan Cox writes: > > I've seen GFP_KERNEL take 10 minutes in lk 2.4.6 . The > > mm gets tweaked pretty often so it is difficult to know > > exactly how it will react when memory is tight. A time > > bound would be useful on GFP_KERNEL. > > kmalloc with GFP_KERNEL has a 128K limit which avoids the bizarre > behaviour you get when you abuse get_free_pages. Last I heard, get_free_pages() also has a 128 kiB limit. So what's the difference? Regards, Richard.... Permanent: rgooch@atnf.csiro.au Current: rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca