mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andreas Dilger <adilger@turbolinux.com>
To: Nikita Danilov <NikitaDanilov@yahoo.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <Torvalds@transmeta.com>,
	Reiserfs developers mail-list <Reiserfs-Dev@namesys.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: reiserfs: D-clear-i_blocks.patch
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2001 11:26:52 -0600 (MDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200108021726.f72HQrMh027270@webber.adilger.int> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <15209.30134.699801.417492@beta.namesys.com> "from Nikita Danilov at Aug 2, 2001 07:45:58 pm"

Nikita writes:
> This patch sets inode.i_blocks to zero on deletion of reiserfs
> file. This in particular cures hard to believe bug when saving file in
> EMACS caused top to loose sight of all processes:
>  . reiserfs didn't properly cleared i_blocks when removing
>    symlinks. Actually -7 was inserted into unsigned i_blocks field. This
>    didn't usually hurt because file is being deleted;
>  . inode is reused for procfs and neither get_new_inode() nor
>    proc_read_inode() cleared i_blocks;
>  . now procfs inode has huge i_blocks field;
>  . top calls stat on it and libc wrapper returns EOVERFLOW, as i_blocks
>    doesn't fit into user-level struct.
>  . top sees nothing.

I wonder if you don't have a different problem hiding in there somewhere.
I was thinking that if a non-zero i_blocks field was causing problems for
reiserfs, maybe clear_inode() should zero this out for everyone.

Looking through the reiserfs code (which is rather hard to follow), I see
that reiserfs_cut_from_item() and prepare_for_delete_or_cut() are changing
i_blocks, and this is (eventually) called from reiserfs_delete_item() and
reiserfs_delete_object().  Not that I can point to any specific code, but
to me it would seem that you are not counting i_blocks correctly somewhere,
and eventually decrement i_blocks too much (hence -7 in i_blocks).

So this makes me believe that setting i_blocks=0 is just hiding a block
leak somewhere in the reiserfs code, or math errors somewhere.

It is also true that clear_inode() or get_new_inode() (or proc_read_inode())
should initialize all of the used fields to zero so that a problem in one
filesystem can't cause problems elsewhere.  It appears that i_blocks is
set to zero by ext2_new_inode(), so probably proc_read_inode() should do
the same (since it uses i_blocks).

Cheers, Andreas

PS - could someone on the reiserfs team (or Linus) run the reiserfs code
     through "indent" (or auto format in emacs) per Documentation/CodingStyle?
     It is really a gross mess, to such a point that you can hardly see what
     is going on.  It's not just that it is a different indent style, it has
     no coherent indentation or comment formatting at all.  Maybe for 2.5?
-- 
Andreas Dilger  \ "If a man ate a pound of pasta and a pound of antipasto,
                 \  would they cancel out, leaving him still hungry?"
http://www-mddsp.enel.ucalgary.ca/People/adilger/               -- Dogbert


  reply	other threads:[~2001-08-02 17:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-08-02 15:45 Nikita Danilov
2001-08-02 17:26 ` Andreas Dilger [this message]
2001-08-02 17:45 ` Alexander Viro
2001-08-02 19:21   ` [reiserfs-dev] " Hans Reiser
2001-08-02 18:31 ` Nikita Danilov
2001-08-03 12:53   ` jlnance
2001-08-03 16:16   ` Nikita Danilov
2001-08-30 14:27 Nikita Danilov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200108021726.f72HQrMh027270@webber.adilger.int \
    --to=adilger@turbolinux.com \
    --cc=NikitaDanilov@yahoo.com \
    --cc=Reiserfs-Dev@namesys.com \
    --cc=Torvalds@transmeta.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®