From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 3 Aug 2001 14:42:05 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 3 Aug 2001 14:41:56 -0400 Received: from weta.f00f.org ([203.167.249.89]:65423 "HELO weta.f00f.org") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Fri, 3 Aug 2001 14:41:42 -0400 Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2001 06:42:06 +1200 From: Chris Wedgwood To: Manolis Perakakis Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: RBEM56G-100 card Message-ID: <20010804064206.A17446@weta.f00f.org> In-Reply-To: <20010803180844.56139.qmail@web12908.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20010803180844.56139.qmail@web12908.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.20i X-No-Archive: Yes Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Aug 03, 2001 at 11:08:44AM -0700, Manolis Perakakis wrote: So, would you still recomend the purchase of such a card? (I wouldn't hesitate for REM56G-100BTX but laptop comes with RBEM56G allready!) Don't buy Xircom. Xircom has be swallowed by Intel, who have a funny attitude when it comes to helping linux especially with networking products. I have Xircom cards at present, and they more-or-less work, but I certainly won't buy another. --cw