From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 5 Aug 2001 08:56:01 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 5 Aug 2001 08:55:51 -0400 Received: from cp26357-a.gelen1.lb.nl.home.com ([213.51.0.86]:24467 "HELO lunchbox.oisec.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sun, 5 Aug 2001 08:55:32 -0400 Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2001 14:55:18 +0200 From: Cliff Albert To: Vieri Di Paola Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 128M Message-ID: <20010805145518.A23485@oisec.net> In-Reply-To: <20010805115418.28773.qmail@web4902.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20010805115418.28773.qmail@web4902.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.20i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Aug 05, 2001 at 04:54:18AM -0700, Vieri Di Paola wrote: > I just bought a DIMM 128M RAM module and inserted it > in the motherboard. I took the old 2x8M SIMM modules. > However, my BIOS sees only 32M. I read though that I > can pass the kernel the argument "mem=128m" and Linux > should use all the available RAM. But this operation > leads to an error: "protection fault" and the boot > halts. Could there be a hardware problem with the DIMM > card? Or is just a BIOS thing, in which case there's > isn't anything I can do, or is there? I tried SuSE 6.3 > and BestLinux Release 3 with both lilo and grub. I > passed kernel ... vmlinuz mem=128m but boot fails. > However any mem value below 32m works and the command > "top" shows the correct amount of memory. It's your motherboard that can't cope with the DIMM. The only dimm's it probably will support are 32MB DIMM's. All other (bigger) DIMMs wil not work. -- Cliff Albert | RIPE: CA3348-RIPE | www.oisec.net cliff@oisec.net | 6BONE: CA2-6BONE | icq 18461740