From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 7 Aug 2001 06:45:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 7 Aug 2001 06:44:59 -0400 Received: from [194.92.3.7] ([194.92.3.7]:8848 "EHLO lech.pse.pl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 7 Aug 2001 06:44:41 -0400 Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2001 12:44:13 +0200 From: Lech Szychowski To: "Albert D. Cahalan" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: tulip driver problem Message-ID: <20010807124413.A14235@lech.pse.pl> Reply-To: Lech Szychowski Mail-Followup-To: "Albert D. Cahalan" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20010806100319.C833@cpe-24-221-152-185.az.sprintbbd.net> <200108062016.f76KGmG117015@saturn.cs.uml.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200108062016.f76KGmG117015@saturn.cs.uml.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.20i Organization: Polskie Sieci Elektroenergetyczne S.A. Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > eth0: Setting half-duplex based on MII#1 link partner capability of 0021. > NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out > NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out > NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out > NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out Does eth0 share IRQ with any other card? I got the very same messages when one of my 4-way Adaptec (tulip based) ports got assigned the same IRQ as my SCSI card (53c810a). BTW, that forced me to swich to using de4x5 driver... -- Leszek. -- lech7@pse.pl 2:480/33.7 -- REAL programmers use INTEGERS -- -- speaking just for myself...