From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 7 Aug 2001 11:00:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 7 Aug 2001 10:59:59 -0400 Received: from 64-42-29-14.atgi.net ([64.42.29.14]:11020 "HELO mail.clouddancer.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 7 Aug 2001 10:59:41 -0400 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: tulip driver problem In-Reply-To: <9kogt9$l12$1@ns1.clouddancer.com> In-Reply-To: <20010806100319.C833@cpe-24-221-152-185.az.sprintbbd.net> <200108062016.f76KGmG117015@saturn.cs.uml.edu> <20010807124413.A14235@lech.pse.pl> <200108062016.f76KGmG117015@saturn.cs.uml.edu> <9kogt9$l12$1@ns1.clouddancer.com> Reply-To: klink@clouddancer.com Message-Id: <20010807145951.71904784C1@mail.clouddancer.com> Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2001 07:59:51 -0700 (PDT) From: klink@clouddancer.com (Colonel) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In clouddancer.list.kernel, you wrote: > >Does eth0 share IRQ with any other card? I got the very same messages >when one of my 4-way Adaptec (tulip based) ports got assigned the same >IRQ as my SCSI card (53c810a). BTW, that forced me to swich to using >de4x5 driver... >-- lech7@pse.pl 2:480/33.7 -- REAL programmers use INTEGERS -- Goto Becker's website and fetch the IRQ sharing info, then patch the scsi driver. -- Windows 2001: "I'm sorry Dave ... I'm afraid I can't do that."