From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 9 Aug 2001 15:42:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 9 Aug 2001 15:41:34 -0400 Received: from guestpc.physics.umanitoba.ca ([130.179.72.122]:56837 "EHLO mobilix.ras.ucalgary.ca") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 9 Aug 2001 15:41:03 -0400 Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2001 14:41:15 -0500 Message-Id: <200108091941.f79JfFa05834@mobilix.ras.ucalgary.ca> From: Richard Gooch To: "Kevin P. Fleming" Cc: , Subject: Re: [PATCH] keep devfs partition nodes in sync with block device drivers In-Reply-To: <02b101c120ff$8d2b2990$6baaa8c0@kevin> In-Reply-To: <02b101c120ff$8d2b2990$6baaa8c0@kevin> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Kevin P. Fleming writes: > (I'm resending this again... Richard Gooch raised some points last > time, but I think I adequately answered those. Just because I haven't responded yet doesn't mean I agree. I am still not happy with this approach. Some other approach is needed. I have some ideas, but haven't had the chance to sit and think about it. > There does not appear to be a "cleaner" solution to implement during > 2.4, unless I've missed something obvious) Please don't keep trying to force this patch in. I will get to it in the fullness of time, but I'm travelling at the moment. Regards, Richard.... Permanent: rgooch@atnf.csiro.au Current: rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca