From: Ossama Othman <ossama@doc.ece.uci.edu>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ossama@uci.edu
Subject: Re: Dual 1.7 GHz Xeon -- slow, interrupts not balance, etc
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 15:45:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010816154525.A11206@ece.uci.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010816145446.B7801@ece.uci.edu> <E15XVLG-0006AI-00@the-village.bc.nu>
In-Reply-To: <E15XVLG-0006AI-00@the-village.bc.nu>; from alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk on Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 11:10:18PM +0100
Hi Alan,
Thanks for the response!
On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 11:10:18PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> If you look at the figures from the various benchmarking sites that doesnt
> sound unexpected. If you can recode your applications (eg if its a complex
> analysis problem) to use SSE2 and the like you may well get big speed ups
I noticed those web sites, too, which is why I'm confused as to why
I'm achieving such dismal performance.
I don't think we can take advantage of the SSE2 instruction since
we're mostly using these boxes as fast build/compile boxes.
One of the benchmark sites that I browsed through showed a 30 second
difference in kernel 2.4.2 compile times between a 1 GHz PIII a 1.7GHz
Xeon. I realize that such differences are application dependent, but
we only noticed a 10 second difference in our application (ACE/TAO).
Sometimes the PIII box was faster with the compiles, too.
I wasn't expecting a 70% increase in speed but I did expect a
noticeable performance boost rather than a equal or lesser
performance. Was I expecting too much?
> > Any ideas why CPU1 isn't getting any interrupts? Incidentally,
> > interrupts appear to be fairly well balanced on our PIII box.
>
> Do the boot messages ay anothing about this ?
To be honest, I'm not sure what I should be looking for (sorry... I'm
not a kernel hacker yet). Should I just send the boot messages (about
a 15K file)?
I do get the following from 2.4.7 boot (2.4.8 has the same messages):
IO APIC #2......
.... register #00: 02000000
....... : physical APIC id: 02
.... register #01: 00178020
....... : max redirection entries: 0017
....... : IO APIC version: 0020
WARNING: unexpected IO-APIC, please mail
to linux-smp@vger.kernel.org
WARNING: unexpected IO-APIC, please mail
to linux-smp@vger.kernel.org
.... register #02: 00000000
....... : arbitration: 00
.... IRQ redirection table:
NR Log Phy Mask Trig IRR Pol Stat Dest Deli Vect:
00 000 00 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 00
01 003 03 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 39
02 003 03 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 31
03 003 03 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 41
04 003 03 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 49
05 003 03 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 51
06 003 03 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 59
07 003 03 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 61
08 003 03 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 69
09 003 03 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 71
0a 003 03 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 79
0b 003 03 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 81
0c 003 03 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 89
0d 000 00 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 00
0e 003 03 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 91
0f 003 03 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 99
10 003 03 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 A1
11 003 03 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 A9
12 003 03 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 B1
13 003 03 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 B9
14 003 03 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 C1
15 003 03 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 C9
16 003 03 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 D1
17 003 03 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 D9
I'll send this stuff off to linux-smp, as stated by the message. I
also get the following (probably unrelated) messages:
PCI: Probing PCI hardware
Unknown bridge resource 0: assuming transparent
Unknown bridge resource 0: assuming transparent
Unknown bridge resource 2: assuming transparent
Unknown bridge resource 0: assuming transparent
Unknown bridge resource 1: assuming transparent
Unknown bridge resource 2: assuming transparent
Unknown bridge resource 2: assuming transparent
agpgart: Unsupported Intel chipset (device id: 2531), you might want
to try agp_try_unsupported=1.
agpgart: no supported devices found.
BTW, if this mailing list isn't the appropriate forum for these
issues, I'd be glad to move it to another forum. I certainly don't
want to both the community with noise.
Thanks again,
-Ossama
--
Ossama Othman <ossama@ece.uci.edu>
Distributed Object Computing Laboratory, Univ. of California at Irvine
1024D/F7A394A8 - 84ED AA0B 1203 99E4 1068 70E6 5EB7 5E71 F7A3 94A8
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-08-16 22:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-08-16 21:54 Ossama Othman
2001-08-16 22:10 ` Alan Cox
2001-08-16 22:45 ` Ossama Othman [this message]
2001-08-16 22:59 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010816154525.A11206@ece.uci.edu \
--to=ossama@doc.ece.uci.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ossama@uci.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®