From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 13:03:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 13:02:56 -0400 Received: from mail.cogenit.fr ([195.68.53.173]:13973 "EHLO cogenit.fr") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 13:02:45 -0400 Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 19:02:55 +0200 From: Francois Romieu To: rml@tech9.net Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Optionally let Net Devices feed Entropy Message-ID: <20010816190255.A17095@se1.cogenit.fr> In-Reply-To: <997936615.921.22.camel@phantasy> <20010816105010.A10595@se1.cogenit.fr> <997973433.684.3.camel@phantasy> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <997973433.684.3.camel@phantasy>; from rml@tech9.net on Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 10:50:30AM -0400 X-Organisation: Marie's fan club - I Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Robert Love : [...] > What is experimental about it? The implicit-and-should-be-debated-in-2.5 assumption that the entropy estimate still makes sense ? -- Ueimor