mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Phillips <phillips@bonn-fries.net>
To: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: nigel@nrg.org
Subject: Re: Updated Linux kernel preemption patches
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 05:06:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010827025934Z16098-32383+1547@humbolt.nl.linux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <998877465.801.19.camel@phantasy>
In-Reply-To: <998877465.801.19.camel@phantasy>

On August 27, 2001 03:57 am, Robert Love wrote:
> This is a straight update of Nigel Gamble's Linux kernel preemption
> patch from http://kpreempt.sourceforge.net, updated for the above
> kernels.  Thus, this is Nigel's code -- I merely updated it.
> [...]
> The performance increase in kernel compile and dbench 16 is decent, but
> the decrease in dbench 1 is odd.  I am curious what numbers others find.
> My "how does it feel" benchmark is that bandwidth seems similar while
> multitasking may be a tad smoother with the patch.

Congratulations on showing evidence that preemption can improve performance 
under some loads, especially the all-important kernel compile.  Don't be too 
worried about the dbench 1 results, dbench can vary by a factor of 2 
depending on the alignment of the planets (ask Tridge).  Try something more 
stable like bonnie.

The theory goes that preemption improves performance by cutting down the time 
between IO completion and user task resume, with only a small cost in extra 
locking.  It would be nice to see profiling statistics to support this idea.

--
Daniel

  reply	other threads:[~2001-08-27  2:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-08-27  1:57 Robert Love
2001-08-27  3:06 ` Daniel Phillips [this message]
2001-08-27  3:09 ` Robert Love
2001-08-27  7:38 ` Cliff Albert
2001-08-27 19:31   ` J Sloan
2001-08-27 21:18     ` Robert Love
2001-08-27 21:24       ` Cliff Albert
2001-08-27 21:40       ` Robert Love
2001-08-27 23:06         ` Andrey Nekrasov
2001-08-27 19:44   ` Robert Love
2001-08-27 21:12     ` Andrey Nekrasov
2001-08-27 21:35     ` Robert Love
2001-08-27 13:46 ` Robert Love
2001-08-27 15:20   ` Cliff Albert

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20010827025934Z16098-32383+1547@humbolt.nl.linux.org \
    --to=phillips@bonn-fries.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nigel@nrg.org \
    --cc=rml@tech9.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®