From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 16:17:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 16:17:30 -0400 Received: from humbolt.nl.linux.org ([131.211.28.48]:53000 "EHLO humbolt.nl.linux.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 16:17:20 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Daniel Phillips To: Alex Bligh - linux-kernel , Helge Hafting , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [resent PATCH] Re: very slow parallel read performance Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 22:24:04 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.1] Cc: Alex Bligh - linux-kernel In-Reply-To: <20010827155621Z16272-32385+261@humbolt.nl.linux.org> <516781015.998944596@[169.254.198.40]> In-Reply-To: <516781015.998944596@[169.254.198.40]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: <20010827201728Z16121-32383+1728@humbolt.nl.linux.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On August 27, 2001 09:36 pm, Alex Bligh - linux-kernel wrote: > --On Monday, 27 August, 2001 6:02 PM +0200 Daniel Phillips > wrote: > > > On the other hand, we > > will penalize faster streams that way > > Penalizing faster streams for the same number > of pages is probably a good thing > as they cost less time to replace. Let me clarify, the stream is fast because its client is fast. The disk will service the reads at the same speed for all the streams. (Let's not go into the multi-disk case just now, ok?) -- Daniel