From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 16:56:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 16:56:02 -0400 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:48266 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 16:55:56 -0400 Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 13:56:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20010828.135604.68039530.davem@redhat.com> To: torvalds@transmeta.com Cc: ak@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: page_launder() on 2.4.9/10 issue From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: <20010828.130110.26275634.davem@redhat.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.0 on Emacs 21.0 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Linus Torvalds Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 13:49:40 -0700 (PDT) There might be an argment for making kswapd less eager, and more of a background thing. Regardless of where it actually spends the CPU time. Right, but this is not an argument against fixing __get_swap_page's algorithms to be more reasonable :-) Later, David S. Miller davem@redhat.com