From: Steven Cole <elenstev@mesatop.com>
To: Albert Cranford <ac9410@bellsouth.net>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
Linux Kernel List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch]: incorrect e2fsprog data from ver_linux script
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 21:24:19 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200108310325.f7V3Pge00680@thor.mesatop.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3B8EF06D.24BAB4AF@bellsouth.net>
In-Reply-To: <3B8EF06D.24BAB4AF@bellsouth.net>
On Thursday 30 August 2001 10:03 pm, Albert Cranford wrote:
> Hello Alan/Linus,
> Ted suggested I pass this onto your for 2.2 and 2.4
> Please apply small patch to both releases.
> Thanks,
> Albert
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: incorrect e2fsprog data from ver_linux script
> Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 10:08:27 -0400
> From: Albert Cranford <ac9410@bellsouth.net>
> To: tytso@valinux.com, tytso@mit.edu
>
> Hello Ted,
> I'm not sure when incorrect e2fsprog info started popping
> up from the linux/scripts/ver_linux script, but what do
> you think about submitting this patch to Linus?
> Later,
> Albert
>
Hmm, this worked for e2fsprogs 1.22, e2fsprogs 1.23 was released
8-15-01 according to Sourceforge.
I applied your fix, and yes it now works for 1.23:
[root@localhost linux]# sh scripts/ver_linux
[irrelevant stuff snipped]
modutils 2.4.3
e2fsprogs 1.23
reiserfsprogs 3.x.0i
Ok, so far so good. Now checking ver_linux shipped with 2.4.9-ac5
[root@localhost linux]# sh scripts/ver_linux.ac5
[irrelevant stuff snipped]
modutils 2.4.3
e2fsprogs tune2fs
reiserfsprogs 3.x.0i
Yep, it's broken for e2fsprogs 1.23 all right.
Now, I installed e2fsprogs 1.22, and your new version breaks:
[root@localhost linux]# sh scripts/ver_linux <--- with your patch
[irrelevant stuff snipped]
modutils 2.4.3
e2fsprogs tune2fs
reiserfsprogs 3.x.0i
and the old version (old as in 2.4.9-ac5) works for e2fsprogs 1.22
[root@localhost linux]# sh scripts/ver_linux.ac5
[irrelevant stuff snipped]
modutils 2.4.3
e2fsprogs 1.22
reiserfsprogs 3.x.0i
So, this patch breaks the ver_linux script for 1.22, and 1.21 (I checked
this too). If someone wants to fix this right, please jump in.
Steven
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-08-31 3:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-08-31 2:03 Albert Cranford
2001-08-31 1:24 ` Steven Cole [this message]
2001-08-31 5:42 ` [Better Patch]: " Albert Cranford
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200108310325.f7V3Pge00680@thor.mesatop.com \
--to=elenstev@mesatop.com \
--cc=ac9410@bellsouth.net \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®