From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 1 Sep 2001 06:33:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 1 Sep 2001 06:33:10 -0400 Received: from mx4.port.ru ([194.67.57.14]:55310 "EHLO mx4.mail.ru") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 1 Sep 2001 06:33:00 -0400 From: Samium Gromoff <_deepfire@mail.ru> Message-Id: <200109011455.f81Ethw00685@vegae.deep.net> Subject: Re: lilo vs other OS bootloaders was: FreeBSD makes progress To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2001 14:55:42 +0000 (UTC) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org ANdreas Dilger wrote: > Win2K even abstracts all SMP/UP code into a module (the HAL) and loads this > at boot, thus using the same kernel for both. the only possibility of this shows how ugly is SMP in win2k... this is a situation where they are or geniuses or idiots. MS never proved to be geniuses so they still are idiots... cheers, Sam