From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 2 Sep 2001 13:37:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 2 Sep 2001 13:37:19 -0400 Received: from humbolt.nl.linux.org ([131.211.28.48]:47890 "EHLO humbolt.nl.linux.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 2 Sep 2001 13:37:08 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Daniel Phillips To: Alex Bligh - linux-kernel , Igor Mozetic , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [2.4.9 SMP] alloc_pages failed Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2001 19:44:15 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.1] Cc: Alex Bligh - linux-kernel In-Reply-To: <20010902164323Z16375-32383+3004@humbolt.nl.linux.org> <1026233054.999454747@[169.254.198.40]> In-Reply-To: <1026233054.999454747@[169.254.198.40]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: <20010902173723Z16283-32383+3012@humbolt.nl.linux.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On September 2, 2001 07:19 pm, Alex Bligh - linux-kernel wrote: > I think Daniel's two patches are the wrong way around. IE > the second (labelled as the first) is the instrumentation > to differentiate between different kinds of failure, and > the first (labelled as the second) is the attempt to > reserve extra pages for atomic allocations to reduce > 0-order failures. Yes, indeed - cut & paste error. -- Daniel