From: Bob McElrath <mcelrath+linux@draal.physics.wisc.edu>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: using O_DIRECT
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 03:32:43 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010904033243.A7872@draal.physics.wisc.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010903104544.X23180@draal.physics.wisc.edu> <20010903175333.P699@athlon.random> <20010903105714.Y23180@draal.physics.wisc.edu> <20010903180524.Q699@athlon.random> <20010903151342.A2247@draal.physics.wisc.edu> <20010904000902.Z699@athlon.random>
In-Reply-To: <20010904000902.Z699@athlon.random>; from andrea@suse.de on Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 12:09:02AM +0200
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1143 bytes --]
Andrea Arcangeli [andrea@suse.de] wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 03:13:42PM -0500, Bob McElrath wrote:
> > I have written a small program to use O_DIRECT (attached), after
> > applying your patch o_direct-14 to kernel 2.4.9. Opening the file with
> > O_DIRECT is successful, but attempts to write to the fd return EINVAL.
> >
> > Am I doing something wrong? Should I have to recompile glibc too?
>
> eh, the alignment and size of the buffer have basically the same
> restrictions of running read/write on a raw device, with the only
> difference that for rawio the granularity is the hardblocksize, while
> for O_DIRECT the granularity is the softblocksize of the filesystem.
Ah, thanks, it's working now. Makes sense that it should use blocksize
granularity...
> We'll have to relax the granularity of the I/O down to the hardblocksize
> for O_DIRECT too eventually.
I don't really care about the granularity. The bigger the better,
actually, since I'm streaming data to disk quickly. ;)
Thanks,
-- Bob
Bob McElrath (rsmcelrath@students.wisc.edu)
Univ. of Wisconsin at Madison, Department of Physics
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 240 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-09-03 22:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20010903104544.X23180@draal.physics.wisc.edu>
[not found] ` <20010903175333.P699@athlon.random>
[not found] ` <20010903105714.Y23180@draal.physics.wisc.edu>
[not found] ` <20010903180524.Q699@athlon.random>
2001-09-03 20:13 ` Bob McElrath
2001-09-03 22:09 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-04 8:32 ` Bob McElrath [this message]
2001-09-03 22:37 ` Andrea Arcangeli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010904033243.A7872@draal.physics.wisc.edu \
--to=mcelrath+linux@draal.physics.wisc.edu \
--cc=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®