From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 18:02:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 18:02:33 -0400 Received: from mx9.port.ru ([194.67.57.19]:62399 "EHLO mx9.port.ru") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 18:02:18 -0400 From: Samium Gromoff <_deepfire@mail.ru> Message-Id: <200109050225.f852P6g07976@vegae.deep.net> Subject: procFS performance To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 02:25:05 +0000 (UTC) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Why procfs-related apps eats so much performance? for example - top eats 4.1% of p166 cpu. Also they seem to be a cause for big latencies... is this sane?