From: Caleb Epstein <cae@bklyn.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Spurious NFS ESTALE errors w/NFSv3 server, non-v3 client
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 14:11:17 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010906141117.B7579@tela.bklyn.org> (raw)
I belive this is new behavior in the latest (post-2.4.7 I
believe) kernel NFS software:
I have two machines, both running kernel 2.4.9, each of which
act as both an NFS client and server to the other. I am using
the kernel NFS daemon and am exporting ext2fs filesystems on a
local switched LAN.
One box, called tela, was configured with NFSv3 enabled for
both the client and server code. The other box, hagrid, was
not configured with any NFSv3 support enabled. I just neglected
to enable this in the configuration, its was not for any
particular reason.
When I did large file reads on hagrid (the v2 client), I
would get spurious ESTALE errors on files which are totally
static and haven't been
touched in months. Basically the filesystem contains a lot
of audio files, and I was running md5 checksums on them from
hagrid, while they were hosted on tela.
When I checked the configuration on the client, and realized
that NFSv3 was not enabled, I enabled it and rebuilt the
kernel. After a reboot, the errors disappeared and I can
successfully read many gigabytes of data without a hiccup.
Is this one of those "if it hurts then don't do that" kind of
things, or is it the expected behavior? I think I've had the
two machines configured like this for several kernel
revisions (2.4.0 onwards) and only noticed this behavior since
I switched my server to 2.4.9 from 2.4.7. It *may* have
happened before and I didn't notice it, but I think this was
introduced some time in 2.4.8 or later.
--
cae at bklyn dot org | Caleb Epstein | bklyn . org | Brooklyn Dust Bunny Mfg.
next reply other threads:[~2001-09-06 18:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-09-06 18:11 Caleb Epstein [this message]
2001-09-07 11:42 ` [NFS] " Neil Brown
2001-09-07 13:27 ` Caleb Epstein
2001-09-10 6:49 ` Neil Brown
2001-09-08 2:45 ` mount source code Julius R Sirait
2001-09-08 11:30 ` [NFS] " Trond Myklebust
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010906141117.B7579@tela.bklyn.org \
--to=cae@bklyn.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nfs@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®