From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 13:27:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 13:27:27 -0400 Received: from humbolt.nl.linux.org ([131.211.28.48]:6665 "EHLO humbolt.nl.linux.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 13:27:20 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Daniel Phillips To: Alex Bligh - linux-kernel , Stephan von Krawczynski Subject: Re: page_launder() on 2.4.9/10 issue Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 19:34:41 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.1] Cc: riel@conectiva.com.br, jaharkes@cs.cmu.edu, marcelo@conectiva.com.br, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alex Bligh - linux-kernel In-Reply-To: <20010906171049.4d40da02.skraw@ithnet.com> <598996561.999793086@[10.132.112.53]> In-Reply-To: <598996561.999793086@[10.132.112.53]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: <20010906172741Z16140-26183+20@humbolt.nl.linux.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On September 6, 2001 05:18 pm, Alex Bligh - linux-kernel wrote: > --On Thursday, September 06, 2001 5:10 PM +0200 Stephan von Krawczynski > wrote: > > > (or default = 1024) gives such a ridicolously bad > > performance > > I know. I am trying to ensure we have the problem definitively > identified, either from /proc/memareas, or by showing it > goes away if you change rsize/wsize. I am NOT proposing > it as a fix. Are rsize/wsize expressed in bytes? In which case you'd want them to be 4096 for this test. -- Daniel