From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 16:38:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 16:38:18 -0400 Received: from spike.porcupine.org ([168.100.189.2]:53002 "EHLO spike.porcupine.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 16:38:11 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] ioctl SIOCGIFNETMASK: ip alias bug 2.4.9 and 2.2.19 In-Reply-To: "from Alan Cox at Sep 6, 2001 09:22:33 pm" To: Alan Cox Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 16:38:31 -0400 (EDT) Cc: Wietse Venema , kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, Matthias Andree , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-net@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com X-Time-Zone: USA EST, 6 hours behind central European time X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL82 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Message-Id: <20010906203831.4BCE2BC06C@spike.porcupine.org> From: wietse@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Alan Cox: > > > how everyone did it but they guys with the "newfangled, really not how it > > > should be done, definitely not cricket" machine guns got the last laugh > > > > Keep your superiority complex out of my mailbox, thank you. > > What is it about so many mail system authors and lacking sense of humour. I pointed jokingly at a difference. You had to talk about superiority. The reference to email authors is completely uncalled for. Wietse