mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Phillips <phillips@bonn-fries.net>
To: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <christoph@lameter.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux Preemptive patch success 2.4.10-pre4 + lots of other patches
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 07:35:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010907052850Z16200-26183+115@humbolt.nl.linux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0109062135280.1643-100000@devel.office> <20010907051231Z16200-26183+114@humbolt.nl.linux.org> <999840042.1164.14.camel@phantasy>
In-Reply-To: <999840042.1164.14.camel@phantasy>

On September 7, 2001 07:20 am, Robert Love wrote:
> On Fri, 2001-09-07 at 01:19, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> > On September 7, 2001 06:45 am, Robert Love wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2001-09-07 at 00:36, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > > > Given the minimal nature of the patch I would suggest that it become part
> > > > of 2.4.10 or 11
> > > 
> > > Are you kidding?  We will be lucky to see this in during 2.5.
> > > Its a pretty big change.  It makes the Linux kernel preemptible.
> > 
> > CONFIG_PREEMPT
> 
> and... ?

Sorry, I thought that was self-evident.  It's not a change, it's an option.

> What different conclusion? What are you even arguing with me about? 
> 
> Do you think I am against a preemptible kernel?  I _posted_ the damn
> patch, of course I am not.
> 
> I probably agree with whatever you are thinking.

Yes, violent agreement.  OK, I disagree with your assessment that it's 
a huge change.  Big in effect yes, but not in structural impact.

And you're right, I did think you were arguing against your own patch.

--
Daniel

  reply	other threads:[~2001-09-07  5:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <999835218.2456.16.camel@phantasy>
2001-09-07  4:36 ` Christoph Lameter
2001-09-07  4:45   ` Robert Love
2001-09-07  5:19     ` Daniel Phillips
2001-09-07 12:31       ` safemode
2001-09-07  5:20     ` Robert Love
2001-09-07  5:35       ` Daniel Phillips [this message]
2001-09-07  5:36       ` Robert Love
2001-09-07 12:56       ` Chris Ricker
2001-09-07  2:44 Christoph Lameter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20010907052850Z16200-26183+115@humbolt.nl.linux.org \
    --to=phillips@bonn-fries.net \
    --cc=christoph@lameter.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rml@tech9.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®