From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 7 Sep 2001 12:30:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 7 Sep 2001 12:30:45 -0400 Received: from mx-outgoing.delfi.lt ([213.197.128.109]:5138 "HELO mx-outgoing.delfi.lt") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Fri, 7 Sep 2001 12:30:32 -0400 Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 18:26:21 +0200 (EET) From: Nerijus Baliunas Subject: Re: Basic reiserfs question To: Hans Reiser , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: INLINE In-Reply-To: <3B97729B.1F49AACA@namesys.com> <20010907000239.26A738F91C@mail.delfi.lt> <3B987C2E.DDDDAA0D@namesys.com> In-Reply-To: <3B987C2E.DDDDAA0D@namesys.com> X-Mailer: Mahogany, 0.63 'Saugus', compiled for Linux 2.4.7 i686 Message-Id: <20010907163043.87D038F8D7@mail.delfi.lt> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 07 Sep 2001 11:50:06 +0400 Hans Reiser wrote: HR> I only have secondhand reports from users who patch RedHat boot scripts as HR> described at the end of www.namesys.com/faq.html, so your statement leaves me HR> puzzled as to whether the secondhand reports were from persons who didn't HR> understand the boot scripts. Comments are welcome. Hello, I took time to read FAQ, and here are few comments. 1 - I understand you don't like RedHat, but instead of ranting, you could just say that gcc-2.96 from RH updates or RH 7.1 is OK (Alan Cox even recommends it for compiling recent 2.4 kernels). 16 - also "df -i" shows that there are no used inodes on reiserfs partitions. 36 - Can I use /sbin/badblocks -b on existing reiserfs partition? 39 - a link to "I'm not using RedHat's special release of a buggy compiler" (http://www.namesys.com/gcc-2.96) is not found. 40 - spelling error "ResierFS". 41 - there is nothing about how to solve it. Regards, Nerijus