From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 11 Sep 2001 07:26:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 11 Sep 2001 07:26:07 -0400 Received: from krusty.E-Technik.Uni-Dortmund.DE ([129.217.163.1]:24076 "HELO krusty.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 11 Sep 2001 07:25:55 -0400 Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2001 13:26:15 +0200 From: Matthias Andree To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] ioctl SIOCGIFNETMASK: ip alias bug 2.4.9 and 2.2.19 Message-ID: <20010911132615.F4757@emma1.emma.line.org> Mail-Followup-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20010910100537.W26627@khan.acc.umu.se> <200109101936.XAA00707@ms2.inr.ac.ru> <20010910224002.31693@colin.muc.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20010910224002.31693@colin.muc.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Andi Kleen wrote: > Just hope then that no ifconfig or other binary has a two on the stack > when calling this. One more reply to this, I inserted some debugging info, and all addresses that the kernel saw on this ioctl so far are: 127.0.0.1 the machine's address the machine's broadcast address 85.85.85.85 which I used in testing Postfix' patches 192.255.255.255 <- that's a piece of junk 192.168.0.222 <- that's a piece of junk I already used ifconfig on that machine to display configuration data. I'll see if other addresses turn up. -- Matthias Andree